When Broccoli and Saltzman formed Eon Productions, they wanted to start with Casino Royale , but Ratoff’s lingering claim made it legally impossible. So, they pivoted to Dr. No instead. The rest is history.
Fleming, desperate to get his hero on screen, agreed. He then sold the rights to all future Bond books to a pair of producers you might have heard of: Broccoli and Saltzman.
If Ratoff had held onto the rights, James Bond might have been a forgotten B-movie character from the 1950s. Instead, by letting go, he allowed the franchise to fall into the hands that built the legend. gregory ratoff james bond rights relinquished
Why isn't Ratoff’s name on the Dr. No poster? Because when he relinquished the general rights, he only kept Casino Royale .
Looking back, Gregory Ratoff relinquishing the Bond rights was the single best thing to happen to 007. Ratoff saw Bond as a one-off comedy. Broccoli and Saltzman saw a dynasty. When Broccoli and Saltzman formed Eon Productions, they
Ratoff died in 1960, never seeing the Bond phenomenon explode. His estate, however, still held the messy rights to Casino Royale . That led to the 1967 spoof version starring David Niven—a chaotic, psychedelic mess that Ratoff’s widow sold off for a reported $1,000.
When we think of the men who controlled the fate of James Bond, names like Albert R. "Cubby" Broccoli, Harry Saltzman, and Kevin McClory immediately spring to mind. But before the gunbarrel sequence ever existed, the film rights to Ian Fleming’s literary sensation were held by an unlikely character: a boisterous, Russian-born actor-director named Gregory Ratoff. The rest is history
For decades, a fascinating footnote in cinema history has resurfaced among collectors: the moment . It is a story of expired options, handshake deals, and the "what if" that saved 007 from obscurity.
Subscribe to Our Newsletter