In 2022, a court in a small European country received "video evidence" of a political figure accepting a bribe. The video was later revealed to be a deepfake created by a rival faction. But here is the ludicrous twist: the rival faction admitted it was a deepfake, then argued that the deepfake was a "artistic commentary" protected by free speech. The court spent eighteen months debating the legality of the commentary. The original bribery case was forgotten.
A multinational corporation is caught dumping waste in a protected wetland. Their official response is a press release titled "We Have Hired a Team of Expert Mimes to Convey Our Remorse." The mimes perform a silent, sad routine outside the EPA headquarters. The news cycle covers the mimes for three days. The wetland is never mentioned again.
—End of Article—
In 2022, a court in a small European country received "video evidence" of a political figure accepting a bribe. The video was later revealed to be a deepfake created by a rival faction. But here is the ludicrous twist: the rival faction admitted it was a deepfake, then argued that the deepfake was a "artistic commentary" protected by free speech. The court spent eighteen months debating the legality of the commentary. The original bribery case was forgotten.
A multinational corporation is caught dumping waste in a protected wetland. Their official response is a press release titled "We Have Hired a Team of Expert Mimes to Convey Our Remorse." The mimes perform a silent, sad routine outside the EPA headquarters. The news cycle covers the mimes for three days. The wetland is never mentioned again. ludicrous proxy
—End of Article—